+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Enterprise Software Thread, Upgraded Network Infrastructure, Now Can't Image Computers in Technical; Hello, We recently upgraded our physical network infrastructure from Cisco Switches to Aruba S2500 switches. Now, this has upgraded us ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    48
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    13

    Upgraded Network Infrastructure, Now Can't Image Computers

    Hello,

    We recently upgraded our physical network infrastructure from Cisco Switches to Aruba S2500 switches. Now, this has upgraded us so that most of our network is now a full 1Gbps from the server to the workstation. However, I have noticed that when I try and image a machine (using WDS with MDT here...soon SCCM once I have some other problems figured out), the progress bar gets stuck at 5% and doesn't finish downloading the image. Also, I have noticed systems taking longer to PXE boot whereas it used to take maybe a few seconds to get the PXE response, it now seems to take at least 30 seconds or more. In fact, I have even had some systems NOT be able to receive the PXE response at all. I know it is probably something simple that we have to enable on the new Aruba switches, but don't know what setting it would be (plus, trying to learn Aruba's OS).

    Anyone have any ideas?

    Thanks in Advance,

    Scott

  2. #2
    DMcCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Isle of Wight
    Posts
    3,453
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 493 Times in 433 Posts
    Rep Power
    111
    Some NICs have terrible PXE boot implementations, ADMtek, Nvidia especially.

    Try changing the port speed at 100Mb as a test to see if WDS downloads the initial PXE boot quicker. Some machines I've imaged need dropping to 100Mb for boot and back to 1Gb one WDS starts to load for the image deployment.

    If it's multicasting that the issue then check what the igmp settings are, slow DHCP is probably due to spanning tree, set clients to edge ports or use rtsp for the edge swiches.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    72
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    We found that some implementations of spanning tree broke pxe booting. It would take ages or just not happen.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Posts
    452
    Thank Post
    147
    Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
    Rep Power
    43
    Do you use vlan's? The Aruba S2500's look very much like the Juniper EX3300's that I use.

  5. #5

    twin--turbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    2,334
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 381 Times in 340 Posts
    Rep Power
    150
    in ciscoland, seting ports as "portfast" stops them sending/recivind spanning tree BDU information. this means the port comes up and negotiates client links much faster.

    We found PXE DHCP failed on switches without portfast.

    worth investigating.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Computing At School - Network Infrastructure and Systems
    By GrumbleDook in forum General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 6th June 2011, 09:21 AM
  2. T-Mobile customers now can use Orange network
    By tech_guy in forum General Chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 15th October 2010, 10:15 AM
  3. Network infrastructure upgrade - Possible new fiber backbone
    By bozallen in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10th May 2010, 04:49 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21st January 2010, 02:35 PM
  5. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 29th August 2008, 01:09 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •