Educational Software Thread, Stardoll.com and Club Penguin in Technical; Hello All,
Supervising our junior school IT room at lunchtime today, I noticed we had a number of children on ...
-
31st January 2008, 07:59 PM #1 Stardoll.com and Club Penguin
Hello All,
Supervising our junior school IT room at lunchtime today, I noticed we had a number of children on stardoll.com. The idea of the site is to drag assorted items of clothing over a 2D image of a pop star / model / celebrity, which seems to illicit responses from our girls along the lines of "Ooh, isn't she pretty in that top?" and "I don't know if that style is quite right for her...". Choking off my natural reaction to bellow "DAMMIT! YOU'RE BETRAYING THE MEMORIES OF THE VALIANT PIONEERS WHO FOUGHT TIRELESSLY THROUGHOUT THE PREVIOUS CENTURY AND TO THIS DAY TO ALLOW WOMEN EQUAL RIGHTS AND AN ESCAPE FROM THE STEREOTYPES THAT CONFINE THEM!" at the nearest 10-year-old, I waited until lunchtime was over and blocked the URL.
Can anyone suggest a suitible replacement for StarDoll? I suppose a site where you select suitible occupation-related attire for famous female scientists / authors / politicians is too much to hope for?
Also, Club Penguin: is there any actual educational value to this site, or is it simply that someone had a talent for drawing cute penguins and calling their product "educational" was the only way they could figure to market it?
--
David Hicks
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
31st January 2008, 08:05 PM #2 StarDoll and Club Penguin are very popular with primary kids. Most of ours seem to have accounts with one or both - subscriptions paid by their parents at home. They're sort of social networking sites for younger kids. We don't condone or advertise them with their parents, however I was relieved that while the majority of the girls in Years 5 & 6 had these accounts, none of them had bebo or facebook accounts (they're blocked anyway!)
I haven't blocked them... yet, they are only used by those in our late facilities after they've finished their prep.
-
-
31st January 2008, 10:18 PM #3 Whilst I have every sympathy with your indignation David, I worry that you have effectively censored what these pupils do in their free time. I read your posts with interest as they are usually thoughtful and well argued. The care and protection of pupils in schools is paramount, but because the seemingly vacuous Stardoll offends your personal values, is that any reason to stifle it?
Have you consulted with anyone over this decision?
Please don't take what I say the wrong way. It may be that I write this because I don't have the same moral certainties as you, and sometimes I spend an age debating with myself if I should ban a particular URL.
-
-
31st January 2008, 10:30 PM #4
I waited until lunchtime was over and blocked the URL.
You wait? We block the URL first and then crash their browser. This way we can(remotely) laugh at the students as they type, then retype the URL. It's becoming a lunchtime hobby.
With a bit of Tuxpaint/scratch combination, they could probably make something similar to these sitesthemselves.
-
-
31st January 2008, 11:06 PM #5
-
Thanks to Edu-IT from:
dhicks (1st February 2008)
-
31st January 2008, 11:07 PM #6 
Originally Posted by
CyberNerd
You wait? We block the URL first and then crash their browser. This way we can(remotely) laugh at the students as they type, then retype the URL. It's becoming a lunchtime hobby.
It's a different way of doing things in secondary?
These sites are no worse than 'My little pony', Flower fairies, barbie or any of the other things our girls love. I'd rather they used them at school and were educated about what is and isn't safe to do.
-
-
31st January 2008, 11:15 PM #7 
Originally Posted by
elsiegee40
It's a different way of doing things in secondary?
These sites are no worse than 'My little pony', Flower fairies, barbie or any of the other things our girls love. I'd rather they used them at school and were educated about what is and isn't safe to do.
I guess it is different. We ban the games sites, the blocking method is just more fun, I think I'd class these as 'games' sites. We operate a split lunchtime so there are limited numbers of supervised computers available, if students want to use the computers for homework then thats fine. Those 'playing' will get kicked (not literally).
-
-
31st January 2008, 11:54 PM #8 
Originally Posted by
beeswax
Whilst I have every sympathy with your indignation David, I worry that you have effectively censored what these pupils do in their free time.
Our tuition fees are £3000 a term - any time the pupils spend in our school is most defiantly not free! Seriously, these are prep school pupils (what I would have called middle school when I was their age) - we can't just let them trundle around the Internet completely at will, there has to be a little bit of structure to their time in front of a computer. We'd prefer to have them enjoying themselves and reinforcing positive values at the same time - playing games that make them stretch their minds a little bit and think.
The care and protection of pupils in schools is paramount, but because the seemingly vacuous Stardoll offends your personal values, is that any reason to stifle it? Have you consulted with anyone over this decision?
Yes, of course - the head of the prep school, who mentioned that the teaching staff were keen to have the children able to spend lunchtimes in the IT room, but that they didn't want them playing on that particular site. We're a Catholic convent school, so one of the tenants of the school is that we all have a shared set of values. I guess now we can defiantly say that one of those common beliefs is that StarDoll should be blocked!
Please don't take what I say the wrong way.
No, your post was much appreciated. That's the thing with email/forums - you can't pick up on inflection and gestures. I meant the original post in a jokey kind of way - I'm not actually going to go and shout feminist rants at a poor ten-year-old playing during their lunch break, and I'm not out-and-out frothing-at-the-mouth mad that a child likes a particular website. However, if I can subtly nudge pupils towards an outlook towards themselves a little more positive than just as a clotheshorse to be admired for their adherence to an accepted standard then I figure the world a just a smidgen better.
--
David Hicks
-
-
1st February 2008, 12:24 AM #9 
Originally Posted by
Edu-IT
I'm testing a game at the moment called Moshi Monsters and I can see this being quite good for younger children.
Thanks for that - certainly looks like worth a test play. Looks like a similar idea to Neopets and Club Penguin. I see, looking at some write-ups about the site, that the proprietor is specifically billing (and designing) the site as "educational" and is avoiding Neopets-esque advertising. Just checked the Club Penguin site - that's fee-paying, advert-free too.
Hmm, I still don't know - it rather strikes me that allowing these sites in a school is an endorsement for a private company's product, the main purpose of which is to make profit, no matter what their sales bumf says. One pupil gets an all-singing paid-for account, other pupils go home and pester their parents for one...
--
David Hicks
-
-
1st February 2008, 07:18 AM #10 As the father of two daughters myself and having been a school governor myself, I can appreciate that time spent in school is important, and that structured play is more useful than "dead time" playing online dressing up games, but your ladies are only doing online what generations of young ladies did by dressing up in their parents' clothes. There's a social dimension involved here. Your pupils are interacting and using peer review to assess each other's work, and this can be taken and used elsewhere. These are important developmental stages in a person's life.
I also think a little R 'n' R is useful for recharging the batteries.
The first thing on my mind when I woke this morning, actually the second thing, was that you had been slightly tongue in cheek, it had been a long week etc. and that I had perhaps been a little over critical.
-
-
3rd May 2008, 11:31 PM #11 
Originally Posted by
dhicks
Thanks for that - certainly looks like worth a test play. Looks like a similar idea to Neopets and Club Penguin. I see, looking at some write-ups about the site, that the proprietor is specifically billing (and designing) the site as "educational" and is avoiding Neopets-esque advertising. Just checked the Club Penguin site - that's fee-paying, advert-free too.
Hmm, I still don't know - it rather strikes me that allowing these sites in a school is an endorsement for a private company's product, the main purpose of which is to make profit, no matter what their sales bumf says. One pupil gets an all-singing paid-for account, other pupils go home and pester their parents for one...
--
David Hicks
Thought it might be worth pointing out that Moshi Monsters is now out of beta.
-
-
11th September 2009, 10:01 AM #12 My son is in his second year on Club Penguin and just started SEcondary school be he loves it and I'd say it was the best £37 we've spent.
Normally we buy a DS or Wii game for about £35 and he's completed it in 2 days - He never get's tired of CP and quite a few of his friends are on it plus a few cyber-friends from around the world.
As someone pointed out above - it's really a Social Network Site for kids - it's Disney and it's monitored... I don't know if there are any real educational benefits to it or not but I'd rather him be on CP than Bebo which is a horrible site.
When the time comes and he wan't to move on I think Facebook is the way to go - they are sensible and responsible - unlike the bebo brigade who seem to have a couldn't care less attitude whenever we've tried to report cyber-bullying issues.
-
-
11th September 2009, 10:12 AM #13 Both my teens are on Facebook and now so am I. I'm 'friends' with both of them so I can keep a quiet eye on what's happening... they enjoyed showing their dim ("You're supposed to know about computers") mother how to use Facebook and how to sort out the privacy!
Club Penguin and Neopets are ancient history now... stardolls never figured with my daughter in the first place.
-
-
11th September 2009, 11:02 AM #14 
Originally Posted by
dhicks
I suppose a site where you select suitible occupation-related attire for famous female scientists / authors / politicians is too much to hope for?
Come one, it's a year and a half later - still too much to hope for?
--
David Hicks
-
-
11th September 2009, 02:35 PM #15 I've been on Facebook for about 5 months - on the one hand it's great for keeping in touch with all those friends I do want to and often quicker than e-mailing them. On the other hand I often get Facebook messages from Teachers asking why their Laptop is playing up or why such and such Application isn't working.
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By in forum Educational Software
Replies: 7
Last Post: 3rd February 2010, 06:01 PM
-
By mark in forum Other Stuff
Replies: 6
Last Post: 19th December 2007, 06:55 PM
-
By mark in forum School ICT Policies
Replies: 17
Last Post: 11th June 2007, 08:39 AM
-
By russdev in forum Gaming
Replies: 2
Last Post: 4th August 2005, 08:07 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules