+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
e-Safety Thread, No more regulation for web filtering & e-safety in School Administration; Read Simon's blog post here, and sign the petition: Smoothwall Blogspace: DfE Passes Buck on e-Safety...
  1. #1


    tom_newton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,491
    Thank Post
    868
    Thanked 855 Times in 675 Posts
    Rep Power
    197

    No more regulation for web filtering & e-safety

    Read Simon's blog post here, and sign the petition:
    Smoothwall Blogspace: DfE Passes Buck on e-Safety

  2. 4 Thanks to tom_newton:

    Dos_Box (15th March 2012), GrumbleDook (15th March 2012), john (21st March 2012), Netman (15th March 2012)

  3. #2


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the server room, with the lead pipe.
    Posts
    4,705
    Thank Post
    285
    Thanked 788 Times in 615 Posts
    Rep Power
    226
    Erm, bit of context for those of us who missed the announcement? Or is it just the general abandonment post-Becta?

    Frankly, relying on DoE for useful, well thought out and sane rules regarding eSafety & IT was at best wishful thinking.

  4. Thanks to pete from:

    SimpleSi (15th March 2012)

  5. #3

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    9,370
    Thank Post
    684
    Thanked 2,276 Times in 1,051 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    674
    A link to the DfE annoucement/relevant page could be handy for members please Tom.

  6. Thanks to Dos_Box from:

    SimpleSi (15th March 2012)

  7. #4

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,381
    Thank Post
    525
    Thanked 2,615 Times in 2,021 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    891
    From a comment that Smoothwall have posted on Twitter, it seems that it was from an email from the DfE to Smoothwall, not a general announcement.

  8. #5
    IrritableTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    932
    Thank Post
    118
    Thanked 218 Times in 175 Posts
    Rep Power
    73
    I've been told that smoothwall got an email from the DfE and will not post it publicly.

    https://twitter.com/#!/Smoothwall/st...14849433903105

    I'm in two minds about this. Firstly schools may need to deal with the issue of filtering individually, but unfortunately some schools don't have the local knowledge required.

    [edit] beaten to it again!

  9. #6

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    9,370
    Thank Post
    684
    Thanked 2,276 Times in 1,051 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    674
    I've just been having a look on the DfE site and can't find anything, but TBH, it is next to useless as an information portal

  10. #7
    IrritableTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    932
    Thank Post
    118
    Thanked 218 Times in 175 Posts
    Rep Power
    73
    I did the same last night @Dos_Box, searched high and low, which is why I tweeted smoothwall. I find it slightly odd to create the blog when nobody else can see the original information it is supposedly based on.

  11. #8

    AngryTechnician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,730
    Thank Post
    698
    Thanked 1,214 Times in 761 Posts
    Rep Power
    395
    If the DfE don't want to be open about what is quite a significant dismissal of their responsibilities, I'm more than happy for Smoothwall to tell us what's going on. I think it's worth mentioning that Simon from Smoothwall has started an e-petition to call for this to be reversed, and I for one fully support it:

    Delivering Safe On-line Environments in Schools - e-petitions

  12. #9

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    10,045
    Thank Post
    1,373
    Thanked 1,860 Times in 1,154 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    609
    To say that this is felt by many as a bad move is putting it politely. I can understand that they want to put the onus on schools to taken responsibility but to completely remove with extra support or advice is very dangerous.

    There have been a few people prodding around on this already and on Friday (at the NAACE Conference) I publicly asked David Brown (OFSTED, National Advisor on ICT) about the legislative guidance for schools around eSafety (in reference to his comments about eSafety in subject in sections, the OFSTED report showing that managing eSafety works better than whitelist/blacklist, etc) and the paraphrased answer was that OFSTEd do not legislate but there are plenty out people out there who give advice and guidance. I take this as reference to UKCCIS, CEOP, Childnet, The UK Safe Internet Centre, etc.

    I then asked the same question of Stephen Carrick-Davies in particular in reference to the Munch, Poke, Ping report around young people and conflict experience by vulnerable children (with the example of how many know of the role of eSafety in the Safeguarding Vulnerable Children Act 2006) ... and he pointed out the clear, plain explanation of legislation is needed by schools and education settings and this had been highlighted in the report ... but that there was nothing out there yet. So research says advice and guidance is needed and what is there needs more work.

    So why remove something that supports and builds that? Because some schools try to use it to totally devolve their responsibility? Removing the accreditation will not solve that, merely allow more schools to fall through the gaps ... does this allow schools to fail or is that being cynical.

    I know some folk have seen the RBC role in the accreditation as allowing them to be dictatorial, but the accreditation has nothing to do with that and I have posted enough times about how most RBCs / LAs give you the flexibility to do what you need / want ... it is not about power / control ... it is, first and foremost, about protecting children!

    I'm off to chat with our LSCB shortly and will raise it there too.

    Well done to Simon for raising the ePetition. Having just had a rant about this on the DfE Safetynet mailing list there have already been some firms and other subscribers who have contacted me to see if there is anything else going on to express concern so I will raise the ePetition later on the list too.

    It is going to make the eSafety Live conference and interesting place for discussions.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Suggestions for web filtering solution
    By jayemm in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11th February 2011, 11:15 PM
  2. [News] No need for web filtering anymore
    By creese in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23rd June 2010, 02:15 PM
  3. Retention Policy for Web Filter, Email and Data
    By sjl in forum School ICT Policies
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8th July 2009, 08:11 PM
  4. Cold calls? No more for me ...
    By GrumbleDook in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21st December 2006, 11:41 AM
  5. Which Web Filter for ISA 2004?
    By eejit in forum Windows
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16th June 2006, 11:37 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •