+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
e-Safety Thread, BBC: Facebook Should allow under 13s in School Administration; BBC - Newsbeat - Facebook should allow under 13s says Mark Zuckerberg Discuss! Given that half the population on there ...
  1. #1

    elsiegee40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    10,709
    Thank Post
    1,784
    Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Rep Power
    770

    BBC: Facebook Should allow under 13s

    BBC - Newsbeat - Facebook should allow under 13s says Mark Zuckerberg

    Discuss!

    Given that half the population on there is probably under 13...
    Personally I'd drop the age to 10 or 11 when kids go to secondary school

  2. #2

    Steve21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    2,689
    Thank Post
    334
    Thanked 515 Times in 483 Posts
    Rep Power
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by elsiegee40 View Post
    Discuss!
    They should all be burnt for using Facebook in first place!



    Steve

  3. #3

    Hightower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cloud 9
    Posts
    4,920
    Thank Post
    494
    Thanked 690 Times in 444 Posts
    Rep Power
    241
    Like Zucker's gives a donkeys neck about education for the kids. All he will care about is the income those 10/11/12 years olds are going to generate for him.

  4. #4

    elsiegee40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    10,709
    Thank Post
    1,784
    Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Rep Power
    770
    I agree, but I'd rather kids were on there giving there giving their correct age than lying about their age. It's easier to give them some form of protection.

  5. #5


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,580
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 853 Times in 732 Posts
    Rep Power
    294
    tbh you cant stop it so make you may as well allow them BUT make it so their profile has absolutely minimal info so their name and maybe county thats it no school/birthday etc the boxes for that info should just be greyed out

  6. #6

    Theblacksheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In a house.
    Posts
    1,934
    Thank Post
    138
    Thanked 290 Times in 210 Posts
    Rep Power
    193
    I'm shocked he wants to get them all on the giant datamine younger!

    Its funny that the people who laughed that you went on the internet in the 90s all revolve their life around facebook now. Personally I wouldnt let anyone under 16 on the cancer of the internet.

  7. #7

    Hightower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cloud 9
    Posts
    4,920
    Thank Post
    494
    Thanked 690 Times in 444 Posts
    Rep Power
    241
    When I was a kid I used to get in from school, get changed, and then go climbing trees, or building camps, or play football, or cricket. That's the problem with the world today.....

  8. #8

    elsiegee40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    10,709
    Thank Post
    1,784
    Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Rep Power
    770
    When I was young, the world was black and white

  9. #9

    AngryTechnician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,730
    Thank Post
    698
    Thanked 1,211 Times in 761 Posts
    Rep Power
    394
    Much more detailed article on this: Digital Life - Facebook is coming for your children

    Unmentioned in the Fortune article on NewSchools Summit talk, however, is that lifting the age restriction might be a really, really good way to avoid future lawsuits like the three Facebook currently faces for failure to obtain parental consent for the use of minors' images in ads on the site.

    Also unmentioned: Facebook's alliance with Google, Skype, Yahoo, Twitter, Zynga and — um — eHarmony to oppose a California children's privacy bill that would require users’ permission to display personal information, such as home addresses and phone numbers.

  10. Thanks to AngryTechnician from:

    elsiegee40 (24th May 2011)

  11. #10

    Gatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,658
    Thank Post
    858
    Thanked 646 Times in 429 Posts
    Rep Power
    498
    Personally, I think the limit should be RAISED to at least 16 - maybe even 18

    FB at the moment is a paedophile's wet dream.

    I agree that anyone under the age of 18 should have, by default, a fully locked down profile and WITHOUT the option to unrestrict it, I also think that it should automatically notify parents/carers of all
    chat and PM transcripts, as well as requiring parents to counter approve friend requests.

    Draconian - perhaps, but as a father of a (as of today) 4 year old, who is already starting to find his way around FB simply by watching us, then I think it needs to be!!

  12. #11

    elsiegee40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    10,709
    Thank Post
    1,784
    Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Rep Power
    770
    Quote Originally Posted by Gatt View Post
    Personally, I thin the lmit should be RAISED to at least 16 - maybe even 18

    FB at the moment is a paedophile's wet dream.

    I agree that anyone under the age of 18 should have, by default, a fully locked down profile, I also think that it should automatically notify parents/carers of all
    chat and PM transcripts, as well as requiring parents to counter approve friend requests.

    Draconian - perhaps, but as a father of a (as of today) 4 year old, who is already starting to find his way around FB simply by watching us, then I think it needs to be!!
    It would never work though. As a parent of teenagers, there would be no way of stopping this age group having their accounts. Although, I find it interesting that my two (aged 15 and 17) hardly ever go on facebook these days. The eldest uses skype to chat to her mates and the younger is on the xbox with his.

    I think Zuckerburg would have a completely different view of this if he was parent though.

  13. #12

    maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    3,037
    Thank Post
    209
    Thanked 425 Times in 306 Posts
    Rep Power
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by Gatt View Post
    Personally, I think the limit should be RAISED to at least 16 - maybe even 18

    FB at the moment is a paedophile's wet dream.

    I agree that anyone under the age of 18 should have, by default, a fully locked down profile and WITHOUT the option to unrestrict it, I also think that it should automatically notify parents/carers of all
    chat and PM transcripts, as well as requiring parents to counter approve friend requests.

    Draconian - perhaps, but as a father of a (as of today) 4 year old, who is already starting to find his way around FB simply by watching us, then I think it needs to be!!
    Nice ideas, but it just wouldn't work - kids would just signup for accounts and lie about their age like they do now, and there is absolutely no way of verifying it.

  14. #13


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the server room, with the lead pipe.
    Posts
    4,630
    Thank Post
    275
    Thanked 777 Times in 604 Posts
    Rep Power
    223
    Disagree, not because of age, but because Facebok is insecure by default and kids don't realise how insecure until they get bitten by it.

    If I secure a Facebook account against people that I don't want to access my info, it only takes a Shiny! New! Feature! or back-end fiddling at FB to expose my info again.

    That's unacceptable if you've got idiot children using it. (Yes, idiot adults as well, but I have no loco parentis responsibility for them)

  15. #14

    elsiegee40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    10,709
    Thank Post
    1,784
    Thanked 2,170 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Rep Power
    770
    The trouble is that facebook is already here and kids are already seeing their parents, siblings and mates using it, so they want it too. That will not stop. It's better to have regulated use by children than banning everyone under the age of 18 and having every child under that age lying about how old they are.

  16. #15

    maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    3,037
    Thank Post
    209
    Thanked 425 Times in 306 Posts
    Rep Power
    144
    The more you tell kids they can't do something, the more they will want to do it - that's pretty much a proven fact. Getting a Facebook account is almost becoming a rite of passage for kids these days and to them lieing about their age to get it doesn't seem such a big deal so regardless of any 'age limit' facebook might put on it, it's not going to stop kids signing up.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13th April 2011, 08:29 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13th December 2010, 02:44 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12th April 2010, 01:40 PM
  4. FACEBOOK!
    By Dukey in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 10th February 2010, 12:26 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •