Comments and Suggestions Thread, Subscription for Edugeek : Would you pay? in EduGeek Stuff; The site currently has 5567 members of which 925 are active. I feel it would be safe to say that ...
11th February 2008, 07:12 PM #31
The site currently has 5567 members of which 925 are active. I feel it would be safe to say that some people have drifted away as they've gone into different jobs, the private sector etc. What these 925 active members can't guarantee, is a regular income stream to Edugeek. If some of these active members object to paying a subscription, then the amount needed to cover costs and asked of the others increases. As the fee goes up, more people drop out. The fee goes up again, and as people drop out again you get murmurings of discontent along the lines of, "This isn't the organization I joined X years ago, I'm off!" not only is Edugeek losing members, but it's also being bad mouthed and gaining an unsavoury reputation as a rip off site.
Then we come to our members abroad who may well have differing costs of living, should we have a graduated scale of fees? Then employ an accountant/secretary to do the paperwork? (By the way, who does the paperwork now? Who pays the phone bills?)
It may be unpalatable to some of us on planet Edugeek, but at the moment it's the best and fairest means of supporting all that Edugeek stands for and wishes to accomplish in the future.
Now if you'll just let me get down from my soapbox, I'll be on my way.
IDG Tech News
11th February 2008, 07:23 PM #32
Well we don't get 5k in advetsing (we wish) but db was using bett as example as we want edugeek to be self sustaining and not beg, borrow and steel . So it was just example of how much BETT alone costs.
Who 'cooks'... I mean does the books at moment that would be DB
11th February 2008, 07:23 PM #33
I would pay a small nominal fee myself, I don't mind adverts too much, but not impressed by animated ones after the first post, as it distracts the eyes from the posts around it to the advert. I dont often buy things from banner ads.
11th February 2008, 07:59 PM #34
I don't find the ads to be intrusive i'd only consider paying if the site was in danger of closing.
11th February 2008, 08:00 PM #35
if i had to pay would go back to uk.education.schools-it on google groups
those were the days :-)
11th February 2008, 08:08 PM #36
I'm not really bothered by the ads as they are, so no, I wouldn't pay to be rid of them.
However, if the ads morph in to those bl**dy awful pop-up in the middle of the screen over the top of the page content and make stupid noises, or worse still start playing video, I'd be out of here quicker than you can say ad-blocker.
I would pay to be able to access EduGeek in school, though!
11th February 2008, 09:03 PM #37
Wot adverts? Oh yes, I remember, I use a proper browser with an ad-blocker. Yes, I'd pay £5, and maybe £10 with or without the ads; and I'd support a dual-layer solution.
11th February 2008, 09:12 PM #38
You are JC and I claim my five pounds.
Originally Posted by markcuk
11th February 2008, 10:29 PM #39
I got Microsoft sponsorship...say what you will about Mr Gates, but he certainly knows how to splash the cash on comforts.
Originally Posted by webman
Actually you know..now that I think about it, the microsoft sponsorship may explain the dodgy security on the cage
11th February 2008, 11:26 PM #40
To be honest i'd be happy to keep the ads and pay also.
12th February 2008, 12:40 AM #41
Oooooh I want one of those cages if its MS Sponsored, at least it will work and be ace like the MS House, now if it was Apple Sponsored..........
Originally Posted by Jake
12th February 2008, 09:41 AM #42
A subscription model would drive people away - experts-exchange for example drives me away every time I stumble upon it.
The current model with adverts and donations is the best model, as it is inclusive.
And as I said elsewhere, I don't block any adverts - it is selfish and will cause the downfall of many a small site.
12th February 2008, 09:52 AM #43
The problem with the BBC license is that you legally need to pay it if you have a TV regardless of whether or not you watch any of the BBC channels.
Originally Posted by jwood
12th February 2008, 10:01 AM #44
I can't say the ads annoy me generally; if there is a really garish one, then I just scroll past it so it is off the screen. I have an ad-blocker at home, but that was installed because of a) the hideously bright animated side-bar banner in Facebook and b) the talking/singing ads on popcap! As long as EduGeek doesn't start hosting those ones, I', happy.
That said, while I don't block the ads, I don't click on them either - if I wanted to know about a good brand of switches, I would post a question, ignore the banner ad which appeared and read people's responses; I would not go "ooh, dlink sponsor this forum, I must buy their stuff".
12th February 2008, 10:14 AM #45
FYI (copied from another post):
If you do run Adblocker Plus etc you can right click on the icon in the bottom right corner of FF and click "disable on www.edugeek.net", this will mean any ad's (from any provider) that are displayed on edugeek are shown in your browser. This helps support edugeek and means you the members get better events etc for it. Its like donating but without the need to donate and you never know you might spot a deal
By drjturner in forum General Chat
Last Post: 21st December 2006, 01:23 PM
By Philbert in forum Educational Software
Last Post: 23rd March 2006, 01:41 PM
By indie in forum Comments and Suggestions
Last Post: 27th January 2006, 12:59 PM
By paullong in forum Comments and Suggestions
Last Post: 3rd August 2005, 02:21 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)