+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: BSF feedback please.

  Share/Bookmark
  1. #1

    Reputation
    stevef1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    cleveland
    Posts
    19
    Thank Post
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default BSF feedback please.

    Hi everyone,
    i know lots have been said about BSF in its various forms, i work as network manager at a school that is going through the BSF process and has to make some decisions in the very near future regarding ICT managed service.

    What i would like is some personal feedback both positive (if it exists) and negative (i know this exists) about your schools progress in through BSF, for example.

    What’s your job title before and after BSF?

    Who employs you before and after BSF?

    What role did you play, if any?

    Did the managed service work as expected? Who is your service provider?

    What issues did you as an ICT support team face before and after BSF?

    What impact has BSF had on your job role/description?

    Have you lost members of your team because of BSF?

    Have you lost pay due to BSF?

    Who is your managed service provider?

    Can i or a member of our team visit you for a personal conversation about BSF?

    Anything else you can tell me about your BSF experience?


    thanks, look forward to your info (if any

    stevef1

  2. #2

    Reputation

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    329
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Post BSF I think all ICT staff are gagged. Maybe not literally but certainly contractually!

  3. Thanks to GoldenWonder from:

    bossman (12-11-2009)

  4. #3

    Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead, Somerset
    Posts
    8,384
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thank Post
    264
    Thanked 755 Times in 604 Posts
    Rep Power
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenWonder View Post
    Post BSF I think all ICT staff are gagged. Maybe not literally but certainly contractually!
    How do they manage that, as it would be a variation of the contract conditions...

  5. #4

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    broc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,561
    Thank Post
    48
    Thanked 254 Times in 161 Posts
    Rep Power
    78

    Default

    And pre-BSF & even during the BSF build staff can be treated like mushrooms.....

  6. #5

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    broc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,561
    Thank Post
    48
    Thanked 254 Times in 161 Posts
    Rep Power
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    How do they manage that, as it would be a variation of the contract conditions...
    fear.... maybe it is self inflicted, or paranoia , but fear of retribution can prevent people speaking out ....

  7. #6

    Reputation

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    329
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    How do they manage that, as it would be a variation of the contract conditions...
    Presumably even though your existing contract conditions apply, you would now be working for another private company and therefore will automatically be included in their 'disclosure' type of restrictions - on top your TUPE'd contract.

  8. #7

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    1,103
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    17
    Thanked 133 Times in 111 Posts
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenWonder View Post
    Presumably even though your existing contract conditions apply, you would now be working for another private company and therefore will automatically be included in their 'disclosure' type of restrictions - on top your TUPE'd contract.
    Um, no, they would have to sign a contract agreeing to the NDA.

  9. #8

    Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead, Somerset
    Posts
    8,384
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thank Post
    264
    Thanked 755 Times in 604 Posts
    Rep Power
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by p858snake View Post
    Um, no, they would have to sign a contract agreeing to the NDA.
    But that would be a variation of their contract! That's my point, TUPE doesn't allow that AFAIK.

  10. #9

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    1,103
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    17
    Thanked 133 Times in 111 Posts
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    But that would be a variation of their contract! That's my point, TUPE doesn't allow that AFAIK.
    If they do it just after the TUPE process has been finalised, then it wouldn't be included within in the TUPE policies as to my very brief understanding of contract stuff.

  11. #10

    Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead, Somerset
    Posts
    8,384
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thank Post
    264
    Thanked 755 Times in 604 Posts
    Rep Power
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by p858snake View Post
    If they do it just after the TUPE process has been finalised, then it wouldn't be included within in the TUPE policies as to my very brief understanding of contract stuff.
    No, that is still a variation. When you are tuped over, the company is legally required to maintain the same contract. They can't simply say 'right, we've tuped you over, now that you're ours, we can ignore tupe'. That's not how TUPE works. TUPE is law, not policy.

  12. #11

    Reputation
    mrmontymick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Peterborough, UK
    Posts
    62
    Thank Post
    7
    Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    But that would be a variation of their contract! That's my point, TUPE doesn't allow that AFAIK.
    TUPE does allow for a variation of contract in two main ways - the transferring employee and incoming employer can negotiate a change of contact and agree terms as long as the change is not seen to be to the detriment of the employee.

    Secondly under the ETO terms an incoming employer can vary the terms and conditions of employment. ETO stands for economic, technical, organisational. This being the three primary reasons that are allowed. It is not often used as the defining scope is quite narrow and can be difficult for an employer to defend and if judged to be grossly detrimental to the incoming employee can be a fairly sticky situation for the incoming employer.

    However an NDA or confidentiality agreement can be seen to be outside the scope of the terms and conditions of employment as it can be judged to be an organisational policy agreement thereby negating any issue under TUPE guidelines.

    So, to be blunt, yes you can gag people if you are 1. Devious enough, 2. Have good enough lawyers. Allegedly! :-P

  13. #12

    Reputation Reputation
    e_g_r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Rochdale
    Posts
    418
    Thank Post
    43
    Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    All i can say is that post BSF you don't hear that much from people. Don't forget poor old DEAKS either

  14. #13

    Reputation
    ngreenwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Leeds, Yorkshire
    Posts
    66
    Thank Post
    5
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    I always find it funny that the people who are so 'knowledgeable' about BSF, TUPE and RM are never the ones who have been through it. The negative posts are always rumours or cases of “my mate’s older brother’s mate’s cousin works in X project, and he says all the staff are being laid off”
    The reason you don’t hear from a lot of people post-BSF is because the majority of people see it as the great opportunity that it is and can’t be arsed with the hundreds of moaning posts on the BSF Forum.

  15. #14

    Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead, Somerset
    Posts
    8,384
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thank Post
    264
    Thanked 755 Times in 604 Posts
    Rep Power
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ngreenwood View Post
    I always find it funny that the people who are so 'knowledgeable' about BSF, TUPE and RM are never the ones who have been through it. The negative posts are always rumours or cases of “my mate’s older brother’s mate’s cousin works in X project, and he says all the staff are being laid off”
    The reason you don’t hear from a lot of people post-BSF is because the majority of people see it as the great opportunity that it is and can’t be arsed with the hundreds of moaning posts on the BSF Forum.
    Citation Needed...

  16. #15

    Reputation Reputation
    Grommit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Weston-super-Mare
    Posts
    1,320
    Thank Post
    27
    Thanked 54 Times in 31 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenWonder View Post
    Post BSF I think all ICT staff are gagged. Maybe not literally but certainly contractually!
    Yes once they have been assimilated into the BSF collective we never hear from them again... apart from Deaks (good guy) form the Kent wave who spoke about it and the problems of BSF and was summarily constructively dismissed by the Service Provider after being TUPED or ngreenwood who seems to be a one woman RM propaganda machine :-)

    I believe lower Technicians have a good career prospect if they laike to be part of a big machine but not so good for Managers as the management posts are spread across numerous school is not 1 manager per school ...

    There was a blog about the BSF in Stoke Newington.. she was saying that their network manager had to reapply for a job in the RM pool

    http://bsfatsns.blogspot.com/
    Last edited by Grommit; 12-11-2009 at 11:28 AM. Reason: update.. paranoid of the Stazi accusing me of slagging off mambers .. seems they lots of people cannot take a joke

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Get Involved Feedback
    By EduTech in forum EduGeek May 2009 Conference
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29-05-2009, 07:26 PM
  2. HP 4700N Feedback please
    By ChrisH in forum Hardware
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-06-2008, 12:53 PM
  3. Feedback form
    By tannajay in forum Coding
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-05-2008, 01:23 PM
  4. Website feedback
    By Edu-IT in forum General Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-04-2008, 08:10 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-10-2007, 11:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts