BSF Thread, Public Accounts committee grills Tim Byles in United Kingdom (UK) Specific Forums; In case you haven't seen or read it already, here is a transcript of the Public Accounts Committee questioning Tim ...
10th March 2009, 07:39 PM #1
Public Accounts committee grills Tim Byles
In case you haven't seen or read it already, here is a transcript of the Public Accounts Committee questioning Tim Byles, head of Partnerships for Schools. It is definitely recommended reading for anyone with an interest in how BSF is going.
Uncorrected Evidence 274
If you want the video version, it's here:
The ICT bit only gets going at Q46, but the whole thing is an entertaining read and they don't hold back. Dr Pugh (Lib Dem, Southport) needs some serious congratulations for his input into proceedings.
4 Thanks to sahmeepee:
apoth0r (11th March 2009), Butuz (11th March 2009), El_Nombre (11th March 2009), TerryTibbs (10th March 2009)
11th March 2009, 02:27 PM #2
This thread and the "BSF Alternative business case" thread has succeeded in making me depressed and slightly angry. We may not be getting it in Wales yet - but we probably will as thats all the assembly seem to do is copy england 5 years late. Guess the future for Educational ICT really is bleak.
11th March 2009, 02:50 PM #3
It is entertaining!
Glad to see they also had a hard time over the IT, though being in Wales and at a brand new PFI school I hope we escape this fiasco......
Q68 Mr Bacon: Was Mr Byles's predecessor an internal appointment?
Mr Bell: He was Richard Bowker.
Q69 Mr Bacon: The rail man?
Mr Bell: yes.
Q70 Mr Bacon: He went from the Strategic Rail Authority when it was wound up to Partnerships for Schools?
Mr Bell: Yes. Q71 Mr Bacon: Which genius had that idea?
Mr Bell: It was a properly conducted selection process.
11th March 2009, 03:01 PM #4
I lol'd at that too.
11th March 2009, 03:14 PM #5
Heh, it's quite and interesting read
Q92 Dr Pugh: Following on from client side expertise, which is a concern of this Committee and crops up in connection with a number of different inquiries, you are doing deals for managed services with IT suppliers and the like and advising on the same. How many people of those 100 have specialist professional qualifications in IT?
Mr Byles: Seven.
Q93 Dr Pugh: Seven.
Mr Bell: I find myself, Chairman, in the slightly odd position of wanting to defend the honour of consultants.
Q94 Chairman: Well, nobody else will!
11th March 2009, 03:29 PM #6
Makes you think why these people are employed so highly in the government. not once do they accept responsibility nor do they seem to even care they've cocked up so many things. All because they were too shy to roll their own sleeves up and do some work. GRRRR
*You won't like me when i'm angry*
11th March 2009, 04:27 PM #7
Just gave me some respect for the Public Accounts Committee, to look on the bright side.
By beeswax in forum General Chat
Last Post: 2nd December 2007, 02:13 PM
By sidewinder in forum Windows
Last Post: 1st August 2007, 11:00 PM
By beeswax in forum Other Stuff
Last Post: 30th June 2007, 09:33 PM
By ITWombat in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 2nd October 2006, 12:49 PM
By russdev in forum General EduGeek News/Announcements
Last Post: 2nd July 2006, 01:02 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread