Blog Comments

  1. edugeekdan's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    The soltuion was to add the Domain prefix to the 'username' box of the rdp session file. Thanks
  2. edugeekdan's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Already tried that one and preseumed it didnt work because its a RDP logon box? also checked all the Remote Desktop Services GPO's and cant find any that are useful.
  3. TheScarfedOne's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    @edugeekdan... this one is set in group policy on the server. Create and link a GP for the OU/Machine. The setting is in Computer Configuration > Policies > Windows Settings > Security Options > Interactive Logon: Do not display last username
  4. edugeekdan's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Great Script and this was a major help to me! Thank you.

    Is there anyway to get the last logged in user to the RDP session to be forgotten so it defaults to "use another account" Thanks Dan
  5. X-13's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Win7 is only selling so fast because A) Everyone knows windows and B) you can't buy anything else. [XP/Vista]
  6. Gibbo's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    "Windows 7 has been a hit among enterprise customers". Really? You only have to look at comments on here and on any article relating to XP on The Register to see XP rules supreme.
  7. zag's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    A week after use and this hardware just gets better and better.

    It automatically emails me when someone requests a website unblocked from the denied page. Then it can aggregate the results and I can unblock the most requested with 1 click.
    It is blazingly fast, had loads of comments on how "good the internet" is now
    The reporting features are outstanding.
    It can even email me when someone types in a search word that is banned
    The summary page is excellent showing how much bandwidth is being used now or over a time period.
  8. zag's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Just to update this, we are now moved over to Exchange on-line school wide and very happy so far.

    The original points still remain valid (especially the lack of single sign on and poor active directory integration) but quite happy about the system in terms of email provision.

    Our old Exchange 2003 server is going to run for 6 months then I will turn it off
  9. TheScarfedOne's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    @ICTHUS - the settings are in the zip file attached to the blog post. Its done in the registry.
  10. ICTHUS's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Hso did you change the shell from explorer.exe to mstsc.exe?
  11. TheScarfedOne's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Thin PC is part of Software Assurance under School/Campus and EES Agreements. It was released on 1st July 2011, and should now be showiing up in your Volume Licence Centre. If not, give it a few days, and PM - will get it checked...

    If you happen top be in the Southwest region, I can show you our setup
  12. simpsonj's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Sounds very interesting, especially as I've just started experimenting with Remote Desktops...

    Where did you get WTPC from? Has it been released as part of the MSA/EES agreements? Any licensing issues to be aware of?
  13. tom_newton's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Thanks zag. Most appliance vendors likely base their offering on a linux kernel somewhere way down beneath the shiny tin. This makes hyper-v support quite hard. We're certainly "better than we were" on hyper-v, but I would still generally caution against its use outside of a test environment for Smoothie.

    As for SSD... our support manager is keen - but they still have price and reliability issues which we would not dare pass on to our customers for the benefits offered!

    PS. We have since changed the look of the front panel of our UTM... so hopefully it would pass your high standards now
  14. john's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    How small is this Sophos box? My Smoothwall UTM isn't that big, its probably 50cm deep if that so this Sophos box sounds like its a mini-itx box or something like that?!
  15. zag's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    To be honest it was a close run thing between smoothwall and Sophos. I liked smoothwalls power and support but the Sophos box was easy to use and did the job just as well. I am a great believer in power through simplicity.

    Both companies were willing to match on price so that wasn't a huge issue.

    The Sophos kit is 1u yes but its very light and half depth and looks great (yes I'm that vain).

    I was using the G2 interface on smoothwall but there didn't seem to be a clear schedule of when G3 would be available when I was looking(some time ago).

    The shipping country wasn't a huge problem but I thought I would mention it as the Sophos box came from the UK.

    The hardware thing is understandable but when buying a brand new server that could last 5 years then I want the latest core i5000 whatever

    Neither companies offered a Virtualized Hyper-V solution which was very frustrating. I understand there are good technical reasons for this though.

    Also annoying there is no SSD option
  16. tom_newton's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Too right I would be interested in feedback. We are constantly improving based on it - it just takes a while sometimes Not a massive fan of "2 clicks" type rules, I'd rather have 4 obvious clicks than 2 arcane ones (see: Vi vs Emacs!). We've a way to go... but getting there. Wonder if you saw G2 or G3 interface. The fact you point to our wrong website, and a short review sounds like you spent minimum time on the box. Price wise - we try to be competitive, thats all we can hope for.
    We ship from Germany or California depending on where you are - these are both out of house fulfilment partners (as probably most companies do for appliances). Germany is a good base for shipments as we can cover most of europe, north africa, some of asia very quickly. They're also a really good bunch and do a great job on RMA etc. for us.
    Also... I don't think our hardware is old... the UTM1000 is based on a fairly new core2quad - we'll probably move to a sandybridge platform next year, but to keep costs sane, you have to stick to a platform for a while. If you're owndering why not xeon - heat & power. We find the c2q performs very well for its power draw. And please tell me how to get that CPU, 6 NICs and 2 Western Dig RE4s into a smaller chassis?
    Updated 3rd July 2011 at 01:40 PM by tom_newton
  17. john's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Interesting your comments on Smoothwall, the 1U rack mount appliance isn't that huge, infact its the same size as a Sophos WS1100 which is also a 1U rack appliance.

    I don't find my UTM using much electricity at all either, attractiveness is a personal thing but it certainly isn't ugly with its Blue LCD display and simple design its clean and effective in my view.

    What is wrong with the German shipment, replacement kit arrives on-time and on-schedule and it works what more do you need?

    I am sure that @tom_newton would be very pleased to hear from your and take your feedback on the product, what you don't like about it and the UTM appliance as I am a big fan of the UTM and the product they produce and its been a great asset to us and our entire LA now they are moving onto it, and its a UK designed and supported product, and I know that using it is keeping a good number of people in the UK in jobs
  18. ICTNorth's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Plenty Brain Dumps Mate!! You will be fine lol... Last Microsoft exam I took I noticed they have brought in a lot of simulation within the exam. Reminded me a bit of the CCNA exam but thankfully not as nearly impossible to do in the time they give you lol
  19. jtotheb's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Microsoft changed the wording on their skills measured pages for the Server 2008 exams, which apparently is all they have to do! I don't remember them making it widely know apart from on their own certification forums. They changed them way back last autumn, but the new official second edition R2 training books have only just come out. I sat the 70-642 just after Christmas and it was R2 based, but I'd known it would be going in.
  20. JessFlack's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by IanHamilton
    Jess
    Many thanks. Have been told no funding this year now so on the back burner but I've found out a lot more about how modern apprenticeships work so maybe next year...
    Ian
    Hi Ian,

    That's a shame, but it seems to be a similar picture across the board. Best of luck with your future recruitment. Jess