Ours is a Sonic Wall SSL-VPN 4000 which alows for way more users simultaneously connecting than we ever get but the Head at the time insisted on it thinking that maybe three clesses would try to login remotely at the same time!. I have never seen more than 12 users on at once! It was supplied as a remote access solution by a company but for some reason we did not buy the firmware upgrades which I regret now.
Hi, In the job i work at one of the first jobs what’s to buy one. We purchased ours for £1,800. This included the physical box, licenses, support for 3 years and 3 years upgrades. We got them from Kelway. I am not sure how much it would cost you to get the new firmware. What appliance do you have?
Hi I have had Sonic Wall for about three years now and wondered how costly it is to get a firmware update. How or where do you go for the cheapest price on this. Our Sonic Wall SSL VPN box has been 100% reliable and used everyday, but I would like to improve access for Mac Users. Mark
I have uploaded a copy of Shelly v1.0.0.2 here if anyone needs a copy.
You may not need to disable them entirely, pushing out this USB Drive Letter Manager - USBDLM with some config should work too.
That loophole nevr existed Cam, the loophole you are thinking is selling of new virgin OEM Licenses wtih a cable or something. OEM License have never been transferable from system to system in all the years I can remember.
As CP's resident orangutang, I've got to agree- have gone Ape at Woburn several times and am a big fan of their work. Agreed on the jump offs, can get a bit of harness squeeze if leg loops aren't tight enough! Mark
Originally Posted by dmitrym Facebook is pretty bad too. Most ads are targeted according to what pages you 'Like'. I unliked everything to see what would happen. Result: Facebook now delivers ads that are based off my friends' likes. -_-' I guess the next step is to delete all the friends? haha Oh Facebook has a mention on here already regarding adverts.
Facebook is pretty bad too. Most ads are targeted according to what pages you 'Like'. I unliked everything to see what would happen. Result: Facebook now delivers ads that are based off my friends' likes. -_-' I guess the next step is to delete all the friends? haha
Did they close the loophole where sending a piece of the old machine effectively transferred the OEM licence too? E-Bayers used to ship old components like the network card for free with the licence + disk but this was a long time ago back in the Win 2000 days.
Hi - sorry didn't see this, Im not getting the alert emails from blog comments. No, SCCM/WDS will only boot PXE if its own provider is set up. So - just installing the role isn't enough to take over the other software. Im guessing FOG? This is what I did - just disabled the PXE service when I wanted to carry on using FOG.
Originally Posted by SYNACK Ick, XP... For now. Budget permitting, we'll be moving to Win7 + server2008R2 soon.
Ick, XP...
ROFL he sounds brilliant! I will also hunt for spoiler tags.
Wow, I wish my madness was that commonly built upon by my boss it would mke things more fun
Hi, I have just been skimming over your posts. At the moment we use another bit of software that uses PXE to image computers. If i install WDS on a server but do not configure when a client PXE boots will it boot into WDS? Thanks
Hi, Just to say thanks for posting. I will be following this guide in my test lab. Thanks
Originally Posted by CAM I suppose a video of FPSRussia firing a gold AK47 does have a slightly pimp theme to it. FPS > Type of game > Nerd/Geek > Single + socially inept > Mail-order brides. This is how ad-sense works. [in my experience]
Originally Posted by Morgaine Unfortunately your post comes across as sheer Google fanboism, first because it cites no authoritative information in support of its claims, and second because it uses emotively loaded terms like "awful", "storm in a teacup", "spouting", "garbage", "teacup tsunami", and so on. In other words, sir, you have written a rant. The only support you can possibly get for such an article is from other Google fanbois, and not from someone expecting to read well reasoned and factually supported arguments from both sides in a calm and balanced write-up. Fits quite well in Categories:Rants then. This is a rant but not in support of Google but in derision of the media and it's normal screwed up hysteria.
Unfortunately your post comes across as sheer Google fanboism, first because it cites no authoritative information in support of its claims, and second because it uses emotively loaded terms like "awful", "storm in a teacup", "spouting", "garbage", "teacup tsunami", and so on. In other words, sir, you have written a rant. The only support you can possibly get for such an article is from other Google fanbois, and not from someone expecting to read well reasoned and factually supported arguments from both sides in a calm and balanced write-up.
